2006 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2010 Audi TT
To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,884 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2010 Audi TT. (158 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 2010 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (328 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Audi TT. (250 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Impala | 2010 Audi TT | |
Make | Chevrolet | Audi |
Model | Impala | TT |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3884 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 328 Nm | 250 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4201 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1359 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2469 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 60 L |