2006 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2010 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2010 Honda CR-V is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,884 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2010 Honda CR-V. (180 HP @ 6800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 2010 Honda CR-V.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (328 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Honda CR-V. (218 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Impala | 2010 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
Model | Impala | CR-V |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3884 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 328 Nm | 218 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4554 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1819 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 58 L |