2006 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2012 Volkswagen Sharan
To start off, 2012 Volkswagen Sharan is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,884 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 2012 Volkswagen Sharan. (168 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 2012 Volkswagen Sharan.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volkswagen Sharan (350 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chevrolet Impala. (328 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2012 Volkswagen Sharan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chevrolet Impala.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Impala | 2012 Volkswagen Sharan | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volkswagen |
Model | Impala | Sharan |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3884 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 328 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4854 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1904 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2919 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 7.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |