2006 Chevrolet Kalos vs. 1946 Lancia Ardea 3
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Kalos is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 would be higher. At 1,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Kalos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Kalos (82 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. (28 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Kalos should accelerate faster than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Kalos weights approximately 396 kg more than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Kalos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet Kalos | 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Lancia |
| Model | Kalos | Ardea 3 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1946 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1399 cc | 903 cc |
| Horse Power | 82 HP | 28 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 6.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 674 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 3700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2440 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 29 L |
