2006 Chevrolet Kalos vs. 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Kalos is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 1030 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet Kalos.
Because 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Kalos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Kalos | 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Kalos | Silver Cloud |
Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1399 cc | 6230 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.9:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 157 km/hour | 187 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 2100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 5380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 3130 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.6 L/100km | 15.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 81 L |