2006 Chevrolet Kalos vs. 1972 Zastava 1300

To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Kalos is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Zastava 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Kalos (71 HP) has 18 more horse power than 1972 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Kalos should accelerate faster than 1972 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Kalos weights approximately 55 kg more than 1972 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1972 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Kalos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Kalos (104 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Kalos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Zastava 1300.

Compare all specifications: