2006 Chevrolet Kalos vs. 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Kalos is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 1048 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet Kalos.
Because 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Kalos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Kalos | 1974 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Kalos | Silver Shadow |
Year Released | 2006 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1398 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 2118 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 107 L |