2006 Chevrolet Kalos vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Kalos is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Equator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Equator would be higher. At 1,787 cc, 2000 Ford Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Equator (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2006 Chevrolet Kalos. (71 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Equator should accelerate faster than 2006 Chevrolet Kalos. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Equator weights approximately 173 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet Kalos. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Equator (160 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chevrolet Kalos. (104 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chevrolet Kalos. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 2006 Chevrolet Kalos has manual transmission. 2006 Chevrolet Kalos will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Kalos | 2000 Ford Equator | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Kalos | Equator |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1150 cc | 1787 cc |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 104 Nm | 160 Nm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 1208 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 3260 mm |