2006 Chevrolet Kalos vs. 2002 Jaguar XJR

To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Kalos is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJR (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 297 more horse power than 2006 Chevrolet Kalos. (93 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2006 Chevrolet Kalos. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 595 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet Kalos. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2002 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Kalos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJR (525 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 395 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chevrolet Kalos. (130 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2002 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chevrolet Kalos.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Chevrolet Kalos 2002 Jaguar XJR
Make Chevrolet Jaguar
Model Kalos XJR
Year Released 2006 2002
Body Type Hatchback Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1399 cc 4196 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 93 HP 390 HP
Engine RPM 6200 RPM 6100 RPM
Torque 130 Nm 525 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 78 mm 86.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 73.5 mm 90.3 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 9.1:1
Acceleration 0-100mph 13.7 seconds 5.9 seconds
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1070 kg 1665 kg
Vehicle Length 3890 mm 5100 mm
Vehicle Width 1680 mm 1870 mm
Vehicle Height 1500 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2490 mm 2910 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 6.6 L/100km 12.3 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 L 85 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]