2006 Chevrolet Kalos vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chevrolet Kalos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chevrolet Kalos would be higher. At 1,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Kalos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Kalos (82 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Kalos should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Kalos (123 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 2006 Chevrolet Kalos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Kalos | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Kalos | Micra |
Year Released | 2006 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1399 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 123 Nm | 108 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2449 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.6 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 46 L |