2006 Chevrolet Kodiak vs. 1966 Fiat OT
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Fiat OT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Fiat OT would be higher. At 6,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak (820 Nm) has 686 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Fiat OT. (134 Nm). This means 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Fiat OT.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Kodiak | 1966 Fiat OT | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | Kodiak | OT |
Year Released | 2006 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 6600 cc | 1280 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 75 HP |
Torque | 820 Nm | 134 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1510 mm |