2006 Chevrolet Kodiak vs. 1994 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 6,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak (820 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 603 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Ford Aerostar. (217 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Ford Aerostar.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak | 1994 Ford Aerostar | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Kodiak | Aerostar |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6600 cc | 2978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 133 HP |
| Torque | 820 Nm | 217 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1830 mm |
