2006 Chevrolet Kodiak vs. 1994 Mazda 626
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 6,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak is equipped with a bigger engine.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak (820 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 653 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda 626. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Kodiak | 1994 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Kodiak | 626 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6600 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 820 Nm | 167 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1700 mm |