2006 Chevrolet Kodiak vs. 1994 ZAZ Slavuta
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 ZAZ Slavuta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 ZAZ Slavuta would be higher. At 6,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 ZAZ Slavuta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak has automatic transmission and 1994 ZAZ Slavuta has manual transmission. 1994 ZAZ Slavuta will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak | 1994 ZAZ Slavuta | |
| Make | Chevrolet | ZAZ |
| Model | Kodiak | Slavuta |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6600 cc | 1091 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 51 HP |
| Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1590 mm |
