2006 Chevrolet Kodiak vs. 1996 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 6,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Kodiak | 1996 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercury |
Model | Kodiak | Cougar |
Year Released | 2006 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6600 cc | 3798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1860 mm |