2006 Chevrolet Kodiak vs. 1997 Ford F-250
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford F-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford F-250 would be higher. At 7,275 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1997 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak (820 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Ford F-250. (677 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Ford F-250.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Kodiak | 1997 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Kodiak | F-250 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6600 cc | 7275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 232 HP |
Torque | 820 Nm | 677 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 2040 mm |