2006 Chevrolet Kodiak vs. 2000 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 6,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak | 2000 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
| Model | Kodiak | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6600 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1700 mm |
