2006 Chevrolet Kodiak vs. 2004 GMC Safari
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Safari would be higher. At 6,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak (820 Nm) has 481 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 GMC Safari. (339 Nm). This means 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 GMC Safari.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak | 2004 GMC Safari | |
| Make | Chevrolet | GMC |
| Model | Kodiak | Safari |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6600 cc | 4294 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 191 HP |
| Torque | 820 Nm | 339 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1980 mm |
