2006 Chevrolet Kodiak vs. 2010 Rolls-Royce Ghost
To start off, 2010 Rolls-Royce Ghost is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak would be higher. Both 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak and 2010 Rolls-Royce Ghost are equipped with a 6,600 cc engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak (820 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Rolls-Royce Ghost. (779 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Rolls-Royce Ghost.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Kodiak | 2010 Rolls-Royce Ghost | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Kodiak | Ghost |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6600 cc | 6600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 563 HP |
Torque | 820 Nm | 779 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1948 mm |