2006 Chevrolet Lumina vs. 1958 DKW 600
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Lumina is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 DKW 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 DKW 600 would be higher. At 5,667 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Lumina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Lumina (336 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 306 more horse power than 1958 DKW 600. (30 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Lumina should accelerate faster than 1958 DKW 600.
Because 2006 Chevrolet Lumina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Chevrolet Lumina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 DKW 600, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Lumina (470 Nm) has 413 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 DKW 600. (57 Nm). This means 2006 Chevrolet Lumina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 DKW 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet Lumina | 1958 DKW 600 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | DKW |
| Model | Lumina | 600 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5667 cc | 671 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 336 HP | 30 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 470 Nm | 57 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 74 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 7.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
