2006 Chevrolet Lumina vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport

To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Lumina is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Ecosport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Ecosport would be higher. At 5,667 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Lumina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Lumina (335 HP) has 241 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ecosport. (94 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Lumina should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ecosport.

Because 2006 Chevrolet Lumina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Chevrolet Lumina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Chevrolet Lumina has automatic transmission and 2003 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2003 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Chevrolet Lumina will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Chevrolet Lumina 2003 Ford Ecosport
Make Chevrolet Ford
Model Lumina Ecosport
Year Released 2006 2003
Body Type Pickup SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5667 cc 1000 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 335 HP 94 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 4228 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1980 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1679 mm
Wheelbase Size 2940 mm 2490 mm