2006 Chevrolet Lumina vs. 2005 Ford E-250
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Lumina is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford E-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford E-250 would be higher. At 5,667 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Lumina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Lumina (335 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 2005 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Lumina should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford E-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-250 weights approximately 554 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet Lumina.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Lumina (470 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford E-250. (388 Nm). This means 2006 Chevrolet Lumina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford E-250.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Lumina | 2005 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Lumina | E-250 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Body Type | Pickup | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5667 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 470 Nm | 388 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 2304 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 132 L |