2006 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 3,900 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu (240 HP) has 200 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR.
Because 1960 Toyota Master RR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Toyota Master RR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet Malibu | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
| Model | Malibu | Master RR |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3900 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 240 HP | 40 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 75 L |
