2006 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1961 Maserati Tipo 64
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Maserati Tipo 64. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Maserati Tipo 64 would be higher. At 3,900 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Maserati Tipo 64 (317 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 2006 Chevrolet Malibu. (240 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Maserati Tipo 64 should accelerate faster than 2006 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 1961 Maserati Tipo 64 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Maserati Tipo 64. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Chevrolet Malibu has automatic transmission and 1961 Maserati Tipo 64 has manual transmission. 1961 Maserati Tipo 64 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Chevrolet Malibu will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet Malibu | 1961 Maserati Tipo 64 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Maserati |
| Model | Malibu | Tipo 64 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1961 |
| Engine Size | 3900 cc | 2989 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 240 HP | 317 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 8200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2210 mm |
