2006 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1962 Dodge Polara
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,905 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Dodge Polara (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 2006 Chevrolet Malibu. (201 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Dodge Polara should accelerate faster than 2006 Chevrolet Malibu. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 225 kg more than 1962 Dodge Polara.
Because 1962 Dodge Polara is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Dodge Polara. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet Malibu | 1962 Dodge Polara | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Dodge |
| Model | Malibu | Polara |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3491 cc | 5905 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1525 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2960 mm |
