2006 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1963 Toyota Crown
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 3,900 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu (240 HP) has 160 more horse power than 1963 Toyota Crown. (80 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1963 Toyota Crown.
Because 1963 Toyota Crown is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Toyota Crown. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu (327 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Toyota Crown. (152 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Toyota Crown.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Malibu | 1963 Toyota Crown | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Malibu | Crown |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3900 cc | 1897 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 80 HP |
Torque | 327 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 75 L |