2006 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1963 ZAZ Jalta
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 ZAZ Jalta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 ZAZ Jalta would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu (201 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1963 ZAZ Jalta. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1963 ZAZ Jalta.
Because 1963 ZAZ Jalta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 ZAZ Jalta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu (300 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 ZAZ Jalta. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 ZAZ Jalta.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Malibu | 1963 ZAZ Jalta | |
Make | Chevrolet | ZAZ |
Model | Malibu | Jalta |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 887 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 52 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94.1 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 54.5 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1410 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2030 mm |