2006 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu (201 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu (300 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet Malibu | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
| Model | Malibu | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3491 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 94.1 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 76 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 64 L |
