2006 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1966 Citroen Ak 350
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 3,900 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu (240 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 1966 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen Ak 350.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu (327 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 286 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Citroen Ak 350.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Malibu | 1966 Citroen Ak 350 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Citroen |
Model | Malibu | Ak 350 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 3900 cc | 600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 22 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 327 Nm | 41 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 19 L |