2006 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 3,900 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu (240 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 214 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet Malibu | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Chevrolet | DAF |
| Model | Malibu | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3900 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 240 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 33 L |
