2006 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1966 Holden HD
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 3,900 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu (240 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1966 Holden HD. (122 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden HD.
Because 1966 Holden HD is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden HD. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu (327 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Holden HD. (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Holden HD.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Malibu | 1966 Holden HD | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Malibu | HD |
Year Released | 2006 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3900 cc | 2930 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 327 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2700 mm |