2006 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1972 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 3,900 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu (240 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu (327 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Malibu | 1972 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Malibu | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2006 | 1972 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3900 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 327 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2210 mm |