2006 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1982 Fiat Argenta
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Fiat Argenta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Fiat Argenta would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu (201 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1982 Fiat Argenta. (100 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1982 Fiat Argenta.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu (298 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Fiat Argenta. (135 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Fiat Argenta.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Malibu | 1982 Fiat Argenta | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | Malibu | Argenta |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 1585 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.1 mm | 71.5 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 35 L |