2006 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1982 Mazda 929
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu (201 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1982 Mazda 929. (90 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 600 kg more than 1982 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu (298 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Malibu | 1982 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Malibu | 929 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2620 mm |