2006 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu (144 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 982 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet Malibu | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Zastava |
| Model | Malibu | 102 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 144 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2160 mm |
