2006 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1983 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 3,900 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu (240 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (57 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu (327 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (105 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Malibu | 1983 Fiat Ritmo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | Malibu | Ritmo |
Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3900 cc | 1714 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 327 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2460 mm |