2006 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1986 Ford Tempo
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu (201 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1986 Ford Tempo. (89 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Tempo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu (300 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Ford Tempo. (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Malibu | 1986 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Malibu | Tempo |
Year Released | 2006 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 2307 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94.1 mm | 96.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 79.5 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2540 mm |