2006 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1989 Holden Apollo

To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 3,900 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu (240 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1989 Holden Apollo. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1989 Holden Apollo.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu (327 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Holden Apollo. (171 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Holden Apollo. 2006 Chevrolet Malibu has automatic transmission and 1989 Holden Apollo has manual transmission. 1989 Holden Apollo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Chevrolet Malibu will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Chevrolet Malibu 1989 Holden Apollo
Make Chevrolet Holden
Model Malibu Apollo
Year Released 2006 1989
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3900 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 240 HP 118 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 327 Nm 171 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 4400 RPM
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Vehicle Length 4790 mm 4510 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2610 mm