2006 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1998 Jaguar XK

To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Jaguar XK (290 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2006 Chevrolet Malibu. (240 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2006 Chevrolet Malibu.

Because 1998 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Jaguar XK (393 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chevrolet Malibu. (327 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1998 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chevrolet Malibu.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Chevrolet Malibu 1998 Jaguar XK
Make Chevrolet Jaguar
Model Malibu XK
Year Released 2006 1998
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3900 cc 3995 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 240 HP 290 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 6100 RPM
Torque 327 Nm 393 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 4250 RPM
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4780 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1300 mm
Wheelbase Size 2860 mm 3040 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.2 L/100km 9.5 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 61 L 75 L