2006 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1999 Ford 021 C
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford 021 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford 021 C would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu (201 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1999 Ford 021 C. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford 021 C.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu (300 Nm) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford 021 C. (146 Nm). This means 2006 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford 021 C.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Malibu | 1999 Ford 021 C | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Malibu | 021 C |
Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 146 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 94.1 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 81.3 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 132 L |