2006 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2000 Volvo S60

To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Volvo S60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Volvo S60 would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volvo S60 (246 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2006 Chevrolet Malibu. (201 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 2006 Chevrolet Malibu.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Volvo S60 (330 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chevrolet Malibu. (300 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2000 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chevrolet Malibu.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Chevrolet Malibu 2000 Volvo S60
Make Chevrolet Volvo
Model Malibu S60
Year Released 2006 2000
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3491 cc 2319 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 201 HP 246 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 300 Nm 330 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 2400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 94.1 mm 81 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 90 mm
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4790 mm 4580 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2800 mm
Fuel Consumption 7.4 L/100km 7.7 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 10.7 L/100km 14.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 9.1 L/100km 10.3 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 61 L 70 L