2006 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2005 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Yukon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Yukon would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Yukon (336 HP) has 96 more horse power than 2006 Chevrolet Malibu. (240 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 2006 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 2005 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Chevrolet Malibu. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Yukon (509 Nm) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chevrolet Malibu. (327 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chevrolet Malibu.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Malibu | 2005 GMC Yukon | |
Make | Chevrolet | GMC |
Model | Malibu | Yukon |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3900 cc | 5965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 336 HP |
Torque | 327 Nm | 509 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 5580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.1 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 117 L |