2006 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2009 Acura CSX

To start off, 2009 Acura CSX is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 53 more horse power than 2006 Chevrolet Malibu. (144 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 2006 Chevrolet Malibu. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 439 kg more than 2009 Acura CSX.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Chevrolet Malibu has automatic transmission and 2009 Acura CSX has manual transmission. 2009 Acura CSX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Chevrolet Malibu will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Chevrolet Malibu 2009 Acura CSX
Make Chevrolet Acura
Model Malibu CSX
Year Released 2006 2009
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2199 cc 2000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 144 HP 197 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1752 kg 1313 kg
Vehicle Length 4790 mm 4544 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1752 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1435 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2700 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 7.4 L/100km 6.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 9.8 L/100km 10.2 L/100km