2006 Chevrolet Matiz vs. 1963 Volkswagen 1500
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Matiz is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Volkswagen 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Volkswagen 1500 would be higher. At 1,493 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Volkswagen 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Matiz (65 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1963 Volkswagen 1500. (52 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Matiz should accelerate faster than 1963 Volkswagen 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Volkswagen 1500 weights approximately 135 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet Matiz.
Because 1963 Volkswagen 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Volkswagen 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Matiz | 1963 Volkswagen 1500 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volkswagen |
Model | Matiz | 1500 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 993 cc | 1493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 65 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 795 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 40 L |