2006 Chevrolet Matiz vs. 1978 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Matiz is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Toyota Mark II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Toyota Mark II would be higher. At 1,988 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Toyota Mark II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Toyota Mark II (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2006 Chevrolet Matiz. (51 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Toyota Mark II should accelerate faster than 2006 Chevrolet Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Toyota Mark II weights approximately 420 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1978 Toyota Mark II (170 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chevrolet Matiz. (71 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1978 Toyota Mark II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chevrolet Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Matiz | 1978 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Matiz | Mark II |
Year Released | 2006 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 796 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 775 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2590 mm |