2006 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 1980 Mazda 323
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 205 kg more than 1980 Mazda 323.
Because 1980 Mazda 323 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mazda 323. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Monte Carlo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 1980 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Monte Carlo | 323 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 1415 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2320 mm |