2006 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2008 Mazda CX-7

To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-7 (244 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2006 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. (211 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 2006 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 570 kg more than 2008 Mazda CX-7.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda CX-7 (351 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. (290 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chevrolet Monte Carlo.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Chevrolet Monte Carlo 2008 Mazda CX-7
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model Monte Carlo CX-7
Year Released 2006 2008
Body Type Coupe SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3491 cc 2260 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 211 HP 244 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 290 Nm 351 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 99.2 mm 87.4 mm
Engine Stroke Size 75.9 mm 94 mm
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1750 kg 1180 kg
Vehicle Length 5000 mm 4680 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1880 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1650 mm
Wheelbase Size 2810 mm 2760 mm
Fuel Consumption 7.6 L/100km 10.2 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 9.4 L/100km 12.4 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 69 L