2006 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2013 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2013 Mini Cooper is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 485 kg more than 2013 Mini Cooper.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (290 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Cooper. (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Monte Carlo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Cooper.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 2013 Mini Cooper | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mini |
Model | Monte Carlo | Cooper |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 99.2 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.9 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1265 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 3961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1426 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2547 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.6 L/100km | 5.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 50 L |