2006 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 295 kg more than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (438 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Roadster. (260 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Monte Carlo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mini |
Model | Monte Carlo | Roadster |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 303 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 438 Nm | 260 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 3734 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2467 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.4 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 50 L |