2006 Chevrolet Optra vs. 1989 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Optra is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Optra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Optra weights approximately 650 kg more than 1989 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 1989 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Optra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chevrolet Optra | 1989 Toyota Lite Ace | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
| Model | Optra | Lite Ace |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1989 |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1910 mm |
